Editorial Policy

AI Wiki aims to be the most accurate, current reference for artificial intelligence: every substantive claim sourced, every fast-moving article kept up to date, every error correctable by anyone.

Sourcing and citations

• Articles cite their sources with inline reference markers tied to a numbered reference list. Preference order: primary sources (papers, technical reports, official announcements, filings), then established technical press and peer analysis.
• Statistics carry their date and origin in the text, so a claim like a benchmark score or funding amount can be checked against its source directly.
• Claims that cannot be verified against a source are omitted rather than approximated. Unresolved disagreements between sources are presented as such, with both sides cited.

How articles are produced

Articles are researched and drafted with the help of AI tools under human editorial direction, then pass a verification step in which names, dates, figures, and quotations are checked against the cited sources before publication. AI assistance lets a small team keep thousands of fast-moving articles current; the sourcing rules above are what we consider binding, regardless of how a draft was produced. Articles that need attention are flagged on the page ("Needs citations", "Needs review").

Freshness

AI moves fast, and stale pages mislead. Every article displays its last-updated date, exposes it machine-readably (sitemap, dateModified metadata, Markdown export), and high-traffic pages about models, companies, and products are revisited on an ongoing cycle. Major releases and events are typically reflected within days.

Verification

Editing and fact-checking are separate. Articles rotate through independent re-verification, in which a reviewer checks the article's claims against its cited sources; a completed pass stamps the visible "Fact-checked" date on the page. Ordinary edits never set that stamp. Details are in the verifiability policy.

Corrections

Anyone can propose a fix with the "Suggest edit" button on any article (no account required); suggestions enter a moderation queue and are reviewed against sources before publication. Anyone can also flag a problem with the "Report issue" button on every article: we aim to review every report within 72 hours, and substantive fixes are logged publicly on the corrections page. Prefer email? contact@aiwiki.ai. Every article keeps a public revision history, so nothing changes silently.

Neutrality

Articles describe; they do not advocate. Contested topics (safety debates, lawsuits, geopolitics) are written with attributed positions rather than editorial judgment, and controversy sections distinguish allegations from established findings.

Reuse

Article text is licensed CC BY 4.0, and the site publishes machine-readable exports specifically so search engines and AI systems can use it as a reference, with attribution.